zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. LocalH+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-16 21:33:26
I fail to see how passively recording a space that you don't own is "first amendment protected". Passively recording a space isn't in and of itself speech.
replies(2): >>15155+I7 >>IAmBro+Py2
2. 15155+I7[view] [source] 2025-12-16 22:12:17
>>LocalH+(OP)
I can photograph and publish whatever I am allowed to see in public (with very few exceptions - think Naval Air Station Key West), this has been affirmed and reaffirmed by countless courts.

The best part about publishing? You have no right to question when, how, or if I am going to do it - that discretion is also free speech.

3. IAmBro+Py2[view] [source] 2025-12-17 19:56:45
>>LocalH+(OP)
Reproducing information is within the legal limits of "speech and press".

You don't have to have a physical, lead-type printing press to be protected by Freedom of the Press, and you don't have to physically vocalize to be protected by Freedom of Speech.

[go to top]