zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Havoc+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-15 12:16:23
That may well be an exception though. I'd imagine most SaaS builders are very much figuring things out as they go rather than starting with deep domain expertise
replies(2): >>j45+D5 >>ethbr1+57
2. j45+D5[view] [source] 2025-12-15 12:51:37
>>Havoc+(OP)
Deep domain expertise is not common enough.
3. ethbr1+57[view] [source] 2025-12-15 12:59:52
>>Havoc+(OP)
Additional hot take: deep domain expertise is only value-add while actively adding new features

There's a huge subset of SaaS that's feature-frozen and being milked for ARR.

replies(1): >>martin+nD
◧◩
4. martin+nD[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-15 15:42:58
>>ethbr1+57
Agreed. This is why PE buys so many SaaS companies!

My article here isn't really aimed at "good" SaaS companies that put a lot of thought into design, UX and features. I'm thinking of the tens/hundreds of thousands+ of SaaS platforms that have been bought by PE or virtually abandoned, that don't work very well and send a 20% cost renewal through every year.

[go to top]