zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. eps+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-14 23:13:17
> Cards are content-addressed, that is, identified by the hash of their text.

Wouldn't this invalidate card's review history if I am to fix a typo in the card's text?

replies(4): >>chotma+wq >>zetaly+Qy >>Kerric+0z >>daniel+Bg1
2. chotma+wq[view] [source] 2025-12-15 02:37:13
>>eps+(OP)
obviously, they and their claude didn't think about that
replies(1): >>dnlzro+262
3. zetaly+Qy[view] [source] 2025-12-15 03:58:54
>>eps+(OP)
Yes, and that's fine.
4. Kerric+0z[view] [source] 2025-12-15 04:00:20
>>eps+(OP)
I think that's a good thing. If you learned a false fact based on a typo, you may want to treat the true fact like a brand new fact to be learned.
replies(1): >>victor+EQ
◧◩
5. victor+EQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-15 07:29:22
>>Kerric+0z
Whot is the capital of France? - Paris

Not sure this needs to relearned from scratch

replies(1): >>pvdebb+sS
◧◩◪
6. pvdebb+sS[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-15 07:46:25
>>victor+EQ
Don't you just put tick "know this already" or whatever mechanism is used. It'll be asked a couple of times but it shouldn't be "relearned from scratch".
7. daniel+Bg1[view] [source] 2025-12-15 11:21:48
>>eps+(OP)
I did something similar in markdown as the author, but my solution was to generate an unique anchor with a unicode symbol after each answer.

Kind of wish I had an SSH frontend though.

◧◩
8. dnlzro+262[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-15 16:01:34
>>chotma+wq
Even acknowledging this flaw, there's a valid reason (simplicity) to design it this way.

"Be kind. Don't be snarky."

[go to top]