zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. c-hend+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-13 17:44:09
I hope this isn't the future of "new" languages. Hopefully newer AI tools can actually learn a language and they won't be the limiting factor.
replies(4): >>positr+c >>whimsi+U >>bbatha+47 >>dugmar+cb
2. positr+c[view] [source] 2025-12-13 17:45:39
>>c-hend+(OP)
This is the answer. We need online learning for our own code bases and macros.
3. whimsi+U[view] [source] 2025-12-13 17:51:51
>>c-hend+(OP)
it’s easy enough for them as soon as they have an RL environment for the language
4. bbatha+47[view] [source] 2025-12-13 18:35:28
>>c-hend+(OP)
I’m more interested in what happens when a language is designed specifically for llms? When doing vibe coding a lot of code is a lot more verbose than I’d do normally. Do we drop down the abstraction level because llms are just so good a churning out boilerplate?
replies(1): >>epolan+6m
5. dugmar+cb[view] [source] 2025-12-13 19:11:09
>>c-hend+(OP)
I think as ai tools actually learn languages that functional languages will win out as they are much easier to reason about.
◧◩
6. epolan+6m[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-13 20:31:01
>>bbatha+47
Llms are already good at churning boilerplate, so the next step really is making them good as so they develop taste and architectural consistency imho.
[go to top]