zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. wasmai+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-11-30 09:01:34
Ok… has this been verified? I see no publication or at least an announcement on Harmonics webpage. If this is a big deal, you think it would be a big deal, or is this just hype?
replies(1): >>singul+ca
2. singul+ca[view] [source] 2025-11-30 11:04:05
>>wasmai+(OP)
verified by lean so 99.99% yes
replies(2): >>clucki+Hd >>aaomid+u91
◧◩
3. clucki+Hd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-30 11:51:00
>>singul+ca
Lean verified a proof of a solution to a problem, but was it the same problem as Erdős problem #124?

https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/124#post-1899

replies(1): >>wasmai+441
◧◩◪
4. wasmai+441[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-30 18:37:41
>>clucki+Hd
> My summary is that Aristotle solved "a" version of this problem (indeed, with an olympiad-style proof), but not "the" version.

> I agree that the [BEGL96] problem is still open (for now!), and your plan to keep this problem open by changing the statement is reasonable. Alternatively, one could add another problem and link them. I have no preference. — BorisAlexeev

There we go, so there is hype to some degree.

◧◩
5. aaomid+u91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-30 19:14:30
>>singul+ca
Is there some good literature to read about lean? First time I’m hearing about it and it seems pretty cool.
replies(1): >>anon29+9W5
◧◩◪
6. anon29+9W5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-02 05:20:49
>>aaomid+u91
Anything in type theory. Lean is fundamentally a strongly typed dependently typed programming language. Start with Haskell and keep going.
[go to top]