zlacker

> Agents report that they enjoy working with Beads, and they will use it spontaneously for both recording new work and reasoning about your project in novel ways.

I’m surprised by this wording. I didn’t encounter anyone talking about AI preference yet.

Can a trained LLM develop a preference for a given tool within some context and reliably report on that?

Is “what AI reports enjoying“ aligned with AI’s optimal performance?

>>thih9+(OP)
LLM-s also report that they enjoy my questions, in fact they tell me it's a good question literally every time I ask about their weird choices.

>>thih9+(OP)
The author has a vested interest in AI, that is why it's capabilities may be greatly exaggerated/anthropomorphised as typical for LLM start-ups. Proceed with caution.

>>thih9+(OP)
I think (hope) it's meant to be a joke.

>>Ethery+71
You're absolutely right!

>>thih9+(OP)
Yegge makes stuff up and is known to say controversial things for fun, so I assume it’s trolling. Product pages often have endorsements and adding funny endorsements is an old joke.

But I also can’t rule out that he somehow believes it, which I suppose makes it a good troll.

>>thih9+(OP)
the readme.md seems ai generated

>>lnenad+R7
The more infuriating part of that remark is when its due to you pointing out something really dumb, then you ask yourself, why didn't it ask this in its reasoning? lol