zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. cwillu+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-11-26 08:16:18
https://github.com/9001/copyparty/
replies(1):
>>Admira+KC
◧
2. Admira+KC
[view]
[source]
2025-11-26 14:28:20
>>cwillu+(OP)
Good god, that's a long landing page. It's like they shoved the whole wiki into the readme.
replies(3):
>>jordem+zF
>>yjftsj+2I
>>vinnym+SM
◧◩
3. jordem+zF
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-11-26 14:46:55
>>Admira+KC
This is actually my favorite style of documentation. Just hit me over the head with the whole thing, I can take it.
replies(1):
>>medstr+QM
◧◩
4. yjftsj+2I
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-11-26 15:01:26
>>Admira+KC
Yes, but it starts with an overview, table of contents, and quickstart, so I see no downsides to that approach and lots of upsides.
◧◩◪
5. medstr+QM
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-11-26 15:27:56
>>jordem+zF
Plus, in my experience when I make a separate user manual... a lot fewer people read it.
◧◩
6. vinnym+SM
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-11-26 15:28:02
>>Admira+KC
Most repositories try to create a poor man’s wiki inside of their README. It’s better this way until that problem is solved.
The other style I like is a single sentence with a single link to the actual wiki.
[go to top]