zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. wizzle+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-11-15 00:53:18
After a cursory glance at commit messages, looks like most of it.

Like all AI co-authored code it’s a matter of time before this becomes unmaintainable and abandoned.

replies(1): >>mrweas+9w
◧
2. mrweas+9w[view] [source] 2025-11-15 08:57:44
>>wizzle+(OP)
I'm deeply fascinated that people can make this work at all. Just yesterday I had a fight with an AI regarding some Python code, the stupid thing wouldn't admit it didn't know how to use something and just kept spitting out the same lines of broken code. Then here is someone writing an entire functional Teams client with Claude.
replies(2): >>figmer+6D >>gitmag+gO
◧◩
3. figmer+6D[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-15 10:31:55
>>mrweas+9w
Usually in those scenarios you stop and do the research yourself and correct it. You don't keep asking it. Also starting new conversations often help.
replies(1): >>mrweas+c63
◧◩
4. gitmag+gO[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-15 13:01:50
>>mrweas+9w
> Then here is someone writing an entire functional Teams client with Claude.

According to the README it’s just a wrapper of the web version, with some additional stuff on top.

◧◩◪
5. mrweas+c63[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-16 15:51:07
>>figmer+6D
If I'm doing the research and needs to correct the AI, if faster for just write the code myself. My experience is also that even if I can point to where the errors are, and explain the actual API, I frequently still get the same, broken, result anyway.
[go to top]