zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. saubei+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-11-13 18:10:25
These are
your
internal implementation details. They only make you look untrustworthy, they do not strengthen your case.
replies(1):
>>philwe+2m4
◧
2. philwe+2m4
[view]
[source]
2025-11-15 04:35:15
>>saubei+(OP)
You’re making treaty ratification out to be some weird US-specific thing when it really isn’t.
replies(1):
>>saubei+KE4
◧◩
3. saubei+KE4
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-11-15 09:37:54
>>philwe+2m4
This treaty didn't need to be ratified as it was signed through Obama's executive authority.
[go to top]