zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. paulvn+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-10-28 15:51:51
Maybe if Wikipedia sourced more peer reviewed publications and less Vox, I would be more satisfied. Thrilled to see Grokipedia as a competitor that could perhaps pressure Wikipedia to improve its editorial policies.
replies(3):
>>whokno+v
>>antoni+C1
>>advise+p5
◧
2. whokno+v
[view]
[source]
2025-10-28 15:53:54
>>paulvn+(OP)
If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is.
replies(1):
>>unethi+F1
◧
3. antoni+C1
[view]
[source]
2025-10-28 15:57:49
>>paulvn+(OP)
I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
◧◩
4. unethi+F1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-10-28 15:57:50
>>whokno+v
Poe's Law in effect.
◧
5. advise+p5
[view]
[source]
2025-10-28 16:14:35
>>paulvn+(OP)
Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash.
replies(1):
>>tapete+8m2
◧◩
6. tapete+8m2
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-10-29 07:01:00
>>advise+p5
Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
[go to top]