zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. GaryBl+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-10-28 15:50:35
If it works, it works.
replies(2): >>IAmBro+i >>neaden+23
2. IAmBro+i[view] [source] 2025-10-28 15:51:55
>>GaryBl+(OP)
Unsupervised Source of Truth(tm), what could possibly go wrong?
replies(2): >>sunaoo+65 >>GaryBl+Pc
3. neaden+23[view] [source] 2025-10-28 16:01:36
>>GaryBl+(OP)
Yeah, but it doesn't work. It's full of inaccuracies.
◧◩
4. sunaoo+65[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 16:12:03
>>IAmBro+i
Just like Wikipedia?
replies(2): >>neaden+t8 >>IAmBro+Ci
◧◩◪
5. neaden+t8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 16:26:29
>>sunaoo+65
With Wikipedia there is the talk page which will alert you to controversies about topics, as well as checking the citations. While Grokopedia has "citations" when I checked many of them didn't actually have anything to do with what they were supposed to be citing.
◧◩
6. GaryBl+Pc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 16:44:58
>>IAmBro+i
I don't understand what supervision you want. Worried about inaccuracies? Double check and use it in conjunction with other sources.
replies(1): >>IAmBro+Tj
◧◩◪
7. IAmBro+Ci[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 17:06:42
>>sunaoo+65
Wikipedia has 7 billion potential editors. Grokapedia explicitly says we can't edit it.

So, absolutely the opposite thing.

◧◩◪
8. IAmBro+Tj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 17:12:20
>>GaryBl+Pc
I want some supervision. Why is that hard for you to grasp?
replies(1): >>GaryBl+Ms
◧◩◪◨
9. GaryBl+Ms[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-28 17:48:33
>>IAmBro+Tj
There is supervision, just not community-based.
[go to top]