zlacker

> As an example of how to organise this, you could have a bounty system for feature requests. Users define a feature they want to see and in negotiation with developers set acceptance criteria for when it's delivered. Users can then assign money as an incentive to complete the feature request. In this way, users can ensure they support developers to deliver the features they want to see.

Could you actually provide any examples of large-scale software projects working this way, and not the usual way with coordination being done by special people or w/o any (e.g., by the devs)

>>eviks+(OP)
Large scale? No. However, it has been done before. For example, for open source Amiga development work...

https://power2people.org/projects/overview/

>>ZenoAr+Jt
So it hasn't been done before since scale is key here where toy solutions to coordination problems fail

>>eviks+Iq1
There's nothing stopping the idea from scaling.

>>ZenoAr+zY2
Really!? A good idea .. just scales? Is that how you view the world?

A good idea is nothing without good execution. And execution requires patience, coordination, a good amount of luck .. and so much ideas.

It is like what they say - Ideas are infinite. Nobody cares about them.

>>bitpus+UU3
Explain what problems are encountered with 1000 feature requests linked to bounties that aren't encountered with 10 feature requests linked to bounties.