zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. catlik+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-10-04 18:54:05
Surveillance in the end is a tool, like a gun, which can be used for good or bad.

I doubt any more effort will be made against vandalism for a long time that reaquires to increase surveillance. The cameras and microphones will remain, though.

Edit: I live in a dictatorship. State surveillance and policing has helped with vandalism. But the drawbacks are obvious and nefarious. I would take more vandalism in a mediocre democracy any day.

replies(1): >>nosian+u
2. nosian+u[view] [source] 2025-10-04 18:56:59
>>catlik+(OP)
Uhm... see my first sentence? I'm aware, and I said so.

Obviously I pointed to a conflict (of my interests), that's why I said I'm torn. If I want the second (less vandalism) I'll have to give up at least some of the first (freedom from surveillance while in public places).

[go to top]