zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. refulg+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-10-01 13:00:42
I'm surprised you're reiterating surprise: you were off by two orders of magnitude, and the initial surprise only had purpose as a rhetorical device, it wasn't based on anything (
why
is > 10 surprising? 70M people in UK...)
replies(1):
>>piker+Zj1
◧
2. piker+Zj1
[view]
[source]
2025-10-01 19:36:12
>>refulg+(OP)
Yes, that was just reiterating the initial surprise which as you suggest was rhetorical mostly.
[go to top]