zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. oldjim+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-30 19:26:05
>Following this logic, I suppose that, in the future, cars that cannot automatically detect the presence of a child in a wheelchair and prevent the engine from starting will be banned.

You said this like it is a bad thing, which is baffling? Obviously cars should do this. One of the best things about adding self-driving features is we can add features like this (and speed governors) to make cars a lot safer for everyone.

replies(1): >>p0w3n3+1y1
2. p0w3n3+1y1[view] [source] 2025-10-01 10:01:30
>>oldjim+(OP)
why overregulation is baffling to you?
replies(1): >>rimbo7+YD1
◧◩
3. rimbo7+YD1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-01 11:13:05
>>p0w3n3+1y1
Because it isn’t overregulation? Ensuring cars don’t kill people is a good thing. It’s proven from the last century of road deaths that people can’t actually drive them safely so automating safety is the next best thing.

More generally I don’t think overregulation is really a thing. Just because you don’t see the use case for a rule doesn’t mean there isn’t one or it doesn’t serve some purpose. I think the last 40 years of removing rules have shown we are really bad at knowing where the line is.

[go to top]