zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. notRob+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-30 10:30:00
This has disadvantages though! Often the threads on sites like HN/reddit get "archived" or lose traction and you cannot join the discussion if you don't happen to discover the article in the first few days of it getting published.

In blogs people can come along anytime and use comments to add additional information/context/perspectives, point out misunderstandings or outdated information, share updates, pose questions and start interesting conversations that do not have an expiration date on them.

The discussion for the article can be found on the same webpage by readers, they don't have to go looking on external sites, most of which have terrible searchability and now require logins just to view content and can delete threads and valuable discussions arbitrarily.

I just realised while writing this comment how much I miss web comment culture from the 00s.

replies(4): >>Cthulh+b3 >>chiste+k3 >>accrua+fe1 >>efreak+Mg2
2. Cthulh+b3[view] [source] 2025-09-30 11:05:04
>>notRob+(OP)
Counterpoint, blog posts age; information or opinion from 10 years ago may no longer be accurate or reflect the author's held beliefs. Is it still worth discussing it then?

That said, I run old fashioned forums and some older threads get revived there from time to time with new insights. Others get flagged up by copyright holders under DMCA takedown threats or bumped by spambots though.

replies(3): >>niutec+s7 >>pseuda+Da >>dr_kre+Cb
3. chiste+k3[view] [source] 2025-09-30 11:06:44
>>notRob+(OP)
Good point.
◧◩
4. niutec+s7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 11:48:47
>>Cthulh+b3
Not necessarily 10 years ago, you cannot comment on a HN post even from a month ago!
replies(1): >>zenmac+rw
◧◩
5. pseuda+Da[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 12:20:20
>>Cthulh+b3
Information which is no longer accurate is worth identifying or updating.
◧◩
6. dr_kre+Cb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 12:27:23
>>Cthulh+b3
There's a lot between "few hours on hacker news" and "10 years"
◧◩◪
7. zenmac+rw[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 14:26:44
>>niutec+s7
Why is that? Be good to join discussion from the past and bring back some zombie thread? No?
replies(2): >>edoceo+bE >>accrua+Je1
◧◩◪◨
8. edoceo+bE[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 15:01:58
>>zenmac+rw
No. Re-post / start a new thread. Many times the old-threads will be cross-linked (I see this pattern a lot on HN)
replies(1): >>zenmac+Vd2
9. accrua+fe1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 17:40:33
>>notRob+(OP)
> I just realised while writing this comment how much I miss web comment culture from the 00s.

Remember Shoutboxes? :)

◧◩◪◨
10. accrua+Je1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 17:42:11
>>zenmac+rw
I wanted to add that some zombie/necro posts are useful outside the context of HN.

For example on retro computing boards it makes me so happy when someone bumps a 5 year old thread to share new details, benchmarks, etc. about some card or motherboard where the ancient thread is first thing that appears in search results.

◧◩◪◨⬒
11. zenmac+Vd2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 23:12:55
>>edoceo+bE
Can we post one referencing previous HN link? ?
replies(1): >>edoceo+cr2
12. efreak+Mg2[view] [source] 2025-09-30 23:33:50
>>notRob+(OP)
Counterpoint: the last dozen it so times I've wanted to leave a comment on a website, I scrolled down to find that comments were automatically disabled 24hr/a week/year after the post was created. Nobody wants to deal with moderating comments.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
13. edoceo+cr2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-01 01:16:40
>>zenmac+Vd2
I've not seen it done but, what's a good one? Putnam award?
[go to top]