zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. shakna+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-29 03:21:15
Right. But degaussing isn't a "general" decision. Updating most systems is.
replies(1): >>ang_ci+r
2. ang_ci+r[view] [source] 2025-09-29 03:30:01
>>shakna+(OP)
Degaussing (for orgs who do it) is just as operational a task as updating. There will be an SOP that covers data storage decommissioning. It's not as frequent, but it's not any less 'normal', certainly not ad-hoc or one-off. You don't invest in a degausser "just in case".
replies(1): >>shakna+nb
◧◩
3. shakna+nb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-29 06:07:03
>>ang_ci+r
No, that's not what I meant. I was referring to tasks you might perform regularly on the same machine.

You don't go ahead and erase the same disk once a week. Decommissioning isn't something that occurs for the same project, once a month.

Its not the same operational process.

[go to top]