zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. chucka+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-24 02:37:43
The "pressure campaign" being one guy who decided to withdraw his contribution. Was Mike Perham obligated to publicly associate with DHH indefinitely?
replies(1): >>dullcr+64
2. dullcr+64[view] [source] 2025-09-24 03:18:59
>>chucka+(OP)
I can’t comment on the decisions people made in this case, I was taking up GP’s musings on who we should let have what opinions in general.

I guess I would say that withdrawing funding from an organization based on who they let speak at an event seems like an overreaction given that it had these ramifications, but I don’t think it’s my place to judge what anyone chooses to contribute their own money to. None of the rest of us is contributing $250k to Ruby Central either, and we’re not entitled to have Mike solve our problems.

replies(1): >>mrguyo+AL2
◧◩
3. mrguyo+AL2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-24 21:39:21
>>dullcr+64
>I guess I would say that withdrawing funding from an organization based on who they let speak at an event seems like an overreaction given that it had these ramifications

Wait wait wait, now it's Mike's fault that Shopify acted the way it did and coup'd this organization? Come on. You can't judge his choice to remove funding on what someone else did.

[go to top]