zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. 827a+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-23 19:32:47
Its especially wild given how their action in pulling funding seems to have been a prime motivator for this power grab: in their attempt to boycott DHH, they quite literally handed him the keys to the kingdom.
replies(2): >>evolve+t9 >>makeit+XD
2. evolve+t9[view] [source] 2025-09-23 20:20:22
>>827a+(OP)
It does imply an option here. For the affected ruby gems core team to strike up a sponsorship agreement and launch a forked ruby gems service. For developers who agree that the original team was treated terribly, it’s a one line code change at the top of our Gemfiles to get behind a new gem repository.
3. makeit+XD[view] [source] 2025-09-23 23:24:04
>>827a+(OP)
A "boycott" assumes voiced opinions, and I don't think we have anything public about why Sidekiq stopped sponsoring.

We assume it's linked to DHH because he's an asshole, but that's just our own theories.

[go to top]