zlacker

Everything he quoted is a fact, which can be proven or falsified. Taken together (and if true) they're pretty damning.

You responded with an ad-hominem attack. If you can offer a rebuttal of the facts then please do, otherwise try to refrain from personal attacks.

>>cabote+(OP)
I dunno what you read, but nothing I wrote included any attacks, personal or otherwise.

>>cayman+b9
Ah, you're constructively accusing the author of "[leaving] out a whole lot of context". Non-derogatorily.

>>cayman+b9
It’s “felt slighted” that makes me wonder how often you get into arguments that escalate “for no reason.”

Having access revoked with no heads up is a slight. You’re goddamned right they feel slighted. They were slighted.

“Feel slighted” is like “I’m sorry you’re upset”. You put everything on the aggrieved party when you say it like that.

>>cayman+b9
> Everything you're quoting is from one aggrieved person, who clearly felt slighted, and who left out a whole lot of context in their own post.

^ This was a personal attack.