zlacker

But that's my point. Where is the guy with the opposing view and sharp tongue that's able to talk back to him? The fact that its monetized is good. Talking should be attractive to people. I'm all in favor of that.

>>xtract+(OP)
But it’s not talking it’s rage baiting and selectively clipping your successes, deleting the failures, and using the former to stoke flames online for profit.

>>xtract+(OP)
Modern political commentators and influencers are strategic about who they will engage with and how they engage.

You can see this with Ben Shapiro when he walked out of an interview with conservative BBC host, Andrew Neil. Shapiro was unprepared for a real challenge and his go-to of speaking fast, gish galloping, and calling out the “radical left views” of his opponent didn’t work because the host was a conservative.

https://youtu.be/6VixqvOcK8E?si=GX9TcG7gOgUQH3Bo

If you want a someone who would be an effective counter, look to Mehdi Hasan of Zeteo.

>>thepry+TF
It always baffles me how indignant people like Shapiro get when you simply read their words back to them. They act like you sprung a bear trap around their ankle and are viciously mocking them while they bleed out on the ground. It’s this performative outrage that is meant to distract you from what they’re outraged about, which again is simply quoting what they said. They depend on being able to try on opinions like hats and discard them when they no longer fit the specific argument they are engaging in in that moment, and they get mad when they can’t swap hats.

>>xtract+(OP)
> Where is the guy with the opposing view and sharp tongue that's able to talk back to him?

Even though Kirk made a point to debate students, generally, there were always a few at good schools that pretty thoroughly defeated him.

And in fairness to Kirk, he sometimes posted the in full (albeit always with laughably distorted headlines):

https://youtu.be/RXuePZj5eU0