zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. sarlal+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-11 21:34:45
This assumes facts not in evidence. While the posted quote is sanitized, the assumption that the poster did the sanitization vs. copying from a sanitized source isn't necessarily supported.
replies(1): >>notape+eR9
2. notape+eR9[view] [source] 2025-09-15 19:57:34
>>sarlal+(OP)
Fair enough. But no need for the faux-legalese, it isn't clear whether the OP sanitised it or copied it that way. That changes nothing about my comment though, just who sanitised it.
[go to top]