zlacker

I just don’t see the distinction as clearly when it’s a single binary that cannot be decoupled or introspected.

Why is it if I build a static binary with GPL code and distribute it I must open source my changes; but if you do the same as a whole OS it’s not necessary.

Feels like it should all be fine or none of it is fine somehow.

>>dijit+(OP)
If you go that way, every bash script you've ever written should also be under the GPL.

And R code, at a quick glance.

>>nottor+71
only if someone was to copy the entire script and then put it into their distributed binary; which is what I am saying that the OEMs are doing with Linux.