zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. nroets+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-11 14:34:52
Unless the OEMs bundle numerous changes with the security patch(es).

(I'm not saying it happens. I just theorise how the policy could have been envisaged)

replies(2): >>numpad+NE >>groggl+v62
2. numpad+NE[view] [source] 2025-09-11 18:39:04
>>nroets+(OP)
In the good old days, there were exploits patched years prior by some OEMs that were never upstreamed even to Google. New rooting apps come out and... just doesn't work. I don't know if that still happens, though.
3. groggl+v62[view] [source] 2025-09-12 09:22:15
>>nroets+(OP)
Not really.. numerous changes are still not a total redesign of whichever subsystem was affected so it's pretty obvious where some small security relevant changes are. A stupid embargo was always enough to ruin security by code analysis for white hats but never enough to stop attacks by code analysis for black hats.
replies(1): >>lima+Kpt
◧◩
4. lima+Kpt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-21 18:22:45
>>groggl+v62
Yep, people have been reversing huge Windows patches for decades and it never stopped anyone from figuring out what the fixes were.
[go to top]