zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nptelj+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-11 13:33:32
It's not an uncharitable interpretation, but a literal one. Even then, I can see a world where we could let it go, because people sometimes just misspeak, public setting or not.

But in this current case, the speaker's political background fits the interpretation perfectly, so I don't think that we need to explain it away.

replies(1): >>lostms+032
◧
2. lostms+032[view] [source] 2025-09-12 06:48:22
>>nptelj+(OP)
It is most certainly not the literal interpretation.
replies(1): >>nptelj+Ah2
◧◩
3. nptelj+Ah2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-12 09:12:37
>>lostms+032
I agree, I misspoke. It's not the literal interpretation, it's the interpretation of what was being said, in the context of the speaker.
[go to top]