zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. menset+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:03:28
Give one example of a law you think would come out of this?
replies(7): >>lostdo+l1 >>ceejay+F1 >>thomas+72 >>bdangu+E2 >>foobar+P2 >>Levitz+2d >>GoatIn+Rk
2. lostdo+l1[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:09:59
>>menset+(OP)
How about: tech companies must implement mandatory screenings of users' messages and posts to look for violent intent.
3. ceejay+F1[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:11:06
>>menset+(OP)
Gun bans for groups the Right doesn't like?

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/04/politics/transgender-firearms...

4. thomas+72[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:12:40
>>menset+(OP)
Is it likely the Republicans will ignore this? I have no idea what specific legislation they will come up with.
5. bdangu+E2[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:14:36
>>menset+(OP)
oh man… it’ll be targeted towards complete loss of any little privacy us citizens have left (if there is any).
6. foobar+P2[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:15:56
>>menset+(OP)
I got one, I got one: national guard on college campuses
7. Levitz+2d[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:55:46
>>menset+(OP)
How solid is the first amendment protection for calls for violence?
8. GoatIn+Rk[view] [source] 2025-09-10 22:32:56
>>menset+(OP)
In the context of recent action on exploring removing 2nd amendment rights for trans individuals on mental health grounds AND getting 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' classified as a mental illness, it's difficult to imagine this playing out in a mundane way.
[go to top]