zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dghlsa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-09 15:06:04
You have to look at variability. The cities are doing ok, but it is out in the rural areas, and the reservations specifically, where there are going to be extreme negative outcomes. There are areas on some of the reservations that are yet to be electrified as an illustration of just what kind of challenges NM is up against.
replies(2): >>bombca+e2 >>lp251+z4
2. bombca+e2[view] [source] 2025-09-09 15:13:21
>>dghlsa+(OP)
This is so important when looking at any statistic from an area bigger than "what affects you" - the schools in Roswell have basically no effect on those in Albuquerque.
3. lp251+z4[view] [source] 2025-09-09 15:21:59
>>dghlsa+(OP)
Los Alamos is doing well. That’s about it.
replies(2): >>vjvjvj+vt >>dghlsa+mK
◧◩
4. vjvjvj+vt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-09 16:51:49
>>lp251+z4
It helps to have a super high percentage of nuclear physics PhD in town :-)
◧◩
5. dghlsa+mK[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-09 18:01:00
>>lp251+z4
Los Alamos has a single high school in their district, and it isn’t even close to the top ranked school in the state.

As I said, the variability is the key metric.

[go to top]