zlacker

They'll probably just pass a law that states can't do this? Just like many states passed laws against municipal fiber.

>>thelas+(OP)
I've been told since at least 1980 that small, local government was best. I was given the impression that state level government was probably the optimum level to decide things, cities and counties could go off the rails in various ways.

I haven't see a coherent rationale for reversing course on this doctrine, which was extremely strongly held, and cited a lot.

>>thelas+(OP)
There's no big money that wants otherwise. If anything, corporations are all for this.

>>bedige+K1
There are no principles here, no moral compass, only power. It is important to understand this.

>>bedige+K1
Best for what purpose?

>>bedige+K1
I also think smaller administration cells are more efficient, but when the president of the federation can just reshuffle the congressional districts and meddle with universities internal politics we gotta rethink how independent these states really are. There is no silver bullet, specially in politics.

>>bedige+K1
This is generally the position of politicians with power in state governments, yes.

>>bedige+K1
> I was given the impression that state level government was probably the optimum level to decide things

I don't think government at any level should get to discriminate based on protected classes and I hope most people alive today will agree

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Rock_Nine

>>thelas+(OP)
The federal government has a very different relationship to states, than states do to their municipalities. This law couldn't be passed, even if "they" wanted to.

>>bedige+K1
> I've been told

By whom?

> since at least 1980 that small, local government was best. I was given the impression

By whom?

> extremely strongly held, and cited a lot

By whom?

>>ChrisM+E2
Paid day cares probably have a big issue with this.

>>post_b+gg
Maybe, but they may also get vouchers (that's what it sounds like).

I wouldn't be surprised if it encourages companies to have on-site daycare.

Probably richer taxpayers are the ones that won't like it.

>>mcny+34
That has never been true in practice. Just yesterday, the Supreme Court said that ICE can detain people solely if they are Hispanic and where they are.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/08/supreme-court-ice-r...

>>bedige+K1
There is a rule of subsidiarity -- problems have to be solved at the lowest level possible, because it has the most information. If it's not, it bubbles up to the next level upwards. EU, US and Catholic church all do this to the various degree.

>>outsid+O2
And once you do understand -- then what? You stop complaining and decide to put up with whatever the powers to be are up to, right?

>>outsid+O2
oh whew! I though we'd have to out you as having any.

>>Murome+gm
Incorrect, you keep complaining and decide to put up with the powers that be.