zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. CalRob+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-02 07:57:25
You won’t be able to do much with the second. Web sites will force login with google, etc. and only work for attested browsers.
replies(2): >>Unreac+k7 >>antonk+4b
2. Unreac+k7[view] [source] 2025-09-02 09:16:24
>>CalRob+(OP)
I don't use Google login any where and have a lot of accounts with many different websites? Youtube and other Goolag ecosystem being the exception, but, of course they are?
replies(1): >>CalRob+af
3. antonk+4b[view] [source] 2025-09-02 09:55:57
>>CalRob+(OP)
Both Apple and Google decided against implementing device attestation in browsers.

>>42522490

replies(4): >>hollow+2d >>CalRob+6f >>jsnell+lh >>pessim+5g1
◧◩
4. hollow+2d[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 10:12:52
>>antonk+4b
for now*
◧◩
5. CalRob+6f[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 10:32:53
>>antonk+4b
And Google decided against evil too
◧◩
6. CalRob+af[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 10:33:51
>>Unreac+k7
Give it a few years, the google login nag screens are getting pervasive. And old school user/pw login is dying
replies(1): >>Hackbr+0M
◧◩
7. jsnell+lh[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 10:56:42
>>antonk+4b
Apple has been shipping device attestation in their browser for years (Private Access Tokens), with no backlash.
◧◩◪
8. Hackbr+0M[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 14:02:06
>>CalRob+af
> And old school user/pw login is dying

Is it though? Almost every new service has it, and all existing services keep offering it.

◧◩
9. pessim+5g1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-02 16:17:47
>>antonk+4b
They'll both change their minds at the same politically-opportune time. They're not competitors.
[go to top]