zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. AlecSc+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-28 07:39:26
This comment is really below the standards one might expect here, a total and hominem. Why don't you open one of your own big boy books and tell us which one it was that used no em dashes?
replies(1): >>viccis+NU2
2. viccis+NU2[view] [source] 2025-08-29 06:01:02
>>AlecSc+(OP)
Oh no I did a and hominem

My whole point was that opening "big boy books" doesn't actually make a point about the validity of a thing. That's just argumentum ad populum.

replies(1): >>AlecSc+Wb8
◧◩
3. AlecSc+Wb8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-31 07:02:16
>>viccis+NU2
And what's your argument? YOU have never read any literature that made use of em dashes? But you're showing no evidence of these dashless works at all?

N=0

And yes, you made an ad hominem, check the site guidelines. You can make your point without being a dick.

[go to top]