zlacker

Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

submitted by giulio+(OP) on 2025-08-27 21:27:13 | 196 points 354 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
◧◩
28. capnre+Kb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-27 22:41:54
>>yesco+N8
Sure, if you're learning to write and want lots of examples of a particular style, LLMs can generate that for you. Just don't assume that is a normal writing style, or that it matches a particular genre (say, workplace communication, or academic writing, or whatever).

Our experience (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16107) is that LLMs like GPT-4o have a particular writing style, including both vocabulary and distinct grammatical features, regardless of the type of text they're prompted with. The style is informationally dense, features longer words, and favors certain grammatical structures (like participles; GPT-4o loooooves participles).

With Llama we're able to compare base and instruction-tuned models, and it's the instruction-tuned models that show the biggest differences. Evidently the AI companies are (deliberately or not) introducing particular writing styles with their instruction-tuning process. I'd like to get access to more base models to compare and figure out why.

◧◩◪
107. tkgall+jm[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 00:17:43
>>diego_+m8
Fortunately, em-dash users who have been posting to HN long enough can point to evidence of our pre-ChatGPT use:

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=tkgally&next=3380763...

◧◩◪◨
127. frogpe+CA[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 02:45:25
>>Taek+Nd
I actually use the em dash. I learned it from Butterick’s practical typography years ago.

https://practicaltypography.com/hyphens-and-dashes.html

◧◩◪◨
134. kragen+fB[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 02:50:49
>>Taek+Nd
I have a Compose key binding in https://github.com/kragen/xcompose which maps Compose Space Minus to "—" with two thin spaces on each side of it, because I prefer the spaces. But HN rewrites the thin spaces to regular spaces, so on HN I just use "—" without the spaces, the way ChatGPT does, which is Compose Minus Minus Minus, and is in the standard Compose key bindings (if you map your keyboard to have a Compose key at all).

Examples within the last week include >>44996702 , >>44989129 , >>44991769 , >>44989444 . I typed all of those.

I never use space-hyphen-space instead of an em dash. I do sometimes use TeX's " --- ".

◧◩
143. guessm+YC[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 03:07:53
>>milanc+p6
In my native language, I tend to use more sophisticated, academic, or professional vocabulary. But when I speak or write in English, I usually stick to simpler words because they’re easier for most people, both native and non-native speakers, to understand. For years, I’ve avoided using the kind of advanced vocabulary I normally would in my native language when writing in English, mainly because I didn’t want it to come across as something written by a bot.

And in writing, I like using long dashes—but since they’ve become associated with ChatGPT’s style, I’ve been more hesitant to use them.

Now that a lot of these “LLM buzzwords” have become more common in everyday English, I feel more comfortable using them in conversation.

“Do you even know how smart I am in Spanish?!” — Sofia Vergara (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t34JMTy0gxs)

148. ChrisM+UE[view] [source] 2025-08-28 03:25:46
>>giulio+(OP)
I’m old enough to remember Frank and Moon Unit Zappa’s Valley Girl[0].

It reflected local Los Angeles culture, but it wasn’t long before I was hearing the same type of speech, everywhere (I lived in Maryland, at the time).

[0] https://youtu.be/R5Q1yVLSR3I

◧◩◪◨
149. fngjdf+2F[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 03:26:53
>>Taek+Nd
I use en dash with two spaces and have done so before AI. But my comments here are from after GPT 4 released, so I guess I can't prove I didn't use AI to write them, although I don't think any AIs use that style. Here is one from February 2024: >>39386480 . I don't like how "-" looks, it just looks like a minus sign and too short.
◧◩◪◨
194. dang+YN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 05:09:05
>>tkgall+jm
Indeed!

https://news.ycombinator.com/comments?id=dang&next=33807246#...

>>27787448

251. DrBazz+zd1[view] [source] 2025-08-28 09:29:42
>>giulio+(OP)
It could be worse, it could be 'learnings'. It's lessons. We don't go for 'drivings'. Though ChatGPT will probably force more nonsense like that into the mainstream.

That's from the last decade.

'Please revert' seems to be from the 00's, it's 'reply'. There are others I've tried to ignore and forget.

Language changes, and I'm a dinosaur unfortunately.

I also love the fact American English sometimes uses better, or more interesting words, than English. 'Median' (thanks World's Wildest Police Videos), or 'fall' for autumn.

https://nolearnings.com/

◧◩◪◨
259. latexr+Ph1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 10:21:36
>>Taek+Nd
> Genuine question, do you actually use the formal emdash in your writing?

I’m not the person you asked, but I do.

> the proper emdash—a double long dash with no spaces around it

The spaces around it depend on style guide, it is not universal that they should not exist.

> That's because most keyboards don't have an emdash key

Nor do they have keys for proper quotes and apostrophes or interrobangs, yet it doesn’t stop people from using them. The keys don’t need to exist.

> That's what makes it such a good giveaway.

It’s not. It might be one signal but it is far from sufficient.

> I'm happy to be told that I'm wrong, and that you do actually use the proper double long dash in your writing

I do use the proper em-dash in my writing—and many other characters too—and my HN history is ample proof. I explained at length in another comment how I insert the characters, plus how simple it is if you use any Apple OS.

>>45003650

◧◩◪◨⬒
263. latexr+pk1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 10:48:10
>>dang+YN
Throwing another example in the pot.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24272893#:~:text=—

◧◩◪◨
306. creato+XE2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 18:59:58
>>HaZeus+Nz2
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/05/elon-...
333. Perepi+vs4[view] [source] 2025-08-29 11:23:12
>>giulio+(OP)
Immediately remember this one: https://news.mit.edu/2024/mit-study-explains-laws-incomprehe...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
344. tkgall+4P6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-30 03:42:36
>>dang+1c2
Done: >>45071722
[go to top]