zlacker

from the techcrunch article:

> According to its own survey, Google says that more than 50 times more malware came through internet-sideloaded sources compared with Google Play, where it has required developer verification since 2023.

50:1 is not preventing. It is just "well, we are better than nothing"

I'm pretty sure there can be other curated stores that can serve the customer¹

[1] customer: owner of phone, not advertisers, data merchants, etc

>>m463+(OP)
I regard Google highly in many domains, but this needs independent research. There is just waay too much opportunity to misuse data to paint a picture of themselves as the protectors. Especially curious about their definition of malware, because to me the app stores seem worse than browser toolbars from the 2000s.

>>m463+(OP)
It also shows how bad Google is at preventing malware in the Play store. There are far more than 50x more installs from the Play store than from side loading, which means that most malware is installed through the Play store, despite the much lower barrier to entry for side loading.