zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. dkarl+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-25 23:59:33
> applied for a primary purpose other than facilitating communication between persons involved in criminal activity to defeat law enforcement detection

Does the jurisdiction matter? For example, if an activist was using a device to do things in another country that would be legal in Australia but were crimes in the other country.

replies(1): >>Viscou+R4
2. Viscou+R4[view] [source] 2025-08-26 00:46:31
>>dkarl+(OP)
I doubt a judge would interpret the law that way.
[go to top]