zlacker

> This won't end well for Google or the governments involved when the people get so angry

The amount of people this makes angry is so minuscule that it probably wouldn’t even pass one of those theatrical “sign this petition to get the government to discuss it” thingy. Mind you, the only reason the whole side-loading court cases were going forward is because a giganormous company (Epic) wanted to make more money instead of paying the Google/Apple tax. Not because some people were angry.

>>tokioy+(OP)
This is a lot more complicated than that. I'm not sure how I feel about the demand for government ID. The demand for money that comes with the app stores I find to be a problem and so does the EU, that was a big point of the DMA. It remains to be seen how those regulations play out. Maybe the DMA won't do what I want. But the DMA seems to be aimed at this sort of thing, even if it actually has the same sort of requirements around government ID, it does require openness.

>>tokioy+(OP)
In this instance, quantity isn’t as important. The people it upsets are a loud bunch of a great deal of influence.

>>e-clin+if
They don't. There was a similar uproar when Apple forced developers to share their addresses on AppStore publicly in EU.

>>tokioy+(OP)
Recent precedent suggests it only takes one really angry person to get a company to reconsider its course of action. The problem is software devs are far too comfortable for such action.