zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. maxdam+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-23 15:02:24
But no one has demonstrated an actual operation that requires valid UTF-8. The reasoning is always circular: "I require valid UTF-8 because someone else requires valid UTF-8".

Eventually there should be an underlying operation which can only work on valid UTF-8, but that doesn't exist. UTF-8 was designed such that invalid data can be detected and handled, without affecting the meaning of valid subsequences in the same string.

replies(1): >>amluto+J2q
2. amluto+J2q[view] [source] 2025-09-01 21:06:17
>>maxdam+(OP)
> UTF-8 was designed such that invalid data can be detected and handled, without affecting the meaning of valid subsequences in the same string.

But there is not a canonical response to invalid data. So literally every operation that might need to make a choice of what to do when presented what invalid data should either (a) accept a parameter asking what to do on error and potentially fail or (b) take a parameter type that forces errors to be handled in advance.

[go to top]