zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. UncleO+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-23 01:21:17
I think it would've been much better to incentivize the likes of Apple and Nvidia to make investments in Intel. They need to have their designs fabbed, they have a good amount of geopolitical risk. They also have a lot of money on hand. Didn't Apple say they were going to invest $600B into the US? (not that that's really going to happen), ok, so why not put $50B into Intel?
replies(1): >>electr+si
2. electr+si[view] [source] 2025-08-23 04:35:22
>>UncleO+(OP)
Because that is not a good use of Apple’s $50B.
replies(1): >>menset+411
◧◩
3. menset+411[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 13:47:48
>>electr+si
Their dragon’s hoard of cash is only being used for financial engineering.

Their finance team axed a meager $10B dollar investment to improve Siri thereby making Apple the laughing stock of the tech industry players who say they are working on AI.

replies(1): >>electr+Bf1
◧◩◪
4. electr+Bf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 15:58:25
>>menset+411
Oh, Apple definitely has problems but putting $50B into Intel doesn’t sound like a good idea.
[go to top]