zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. rvba+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:06:22
Getting stock in exchange of grants makes more sense than "pure" grants.

This stock can later be sold, to benefit the taxpayer.

replies(1): >>behrin+A
2. behrin+A[view] [source] 2025-08-22 22:09:24
>>rvba+(OP)
that's not a grant. That's just buying stocks.
replies(1): >>Beetle+b1
◧◩
3. Beetle+b1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 22:14:16
>>behrin+A
It's effectively a grant. The US government isn't buying existing shares. Intel is issuing new shares and selling them to the US government - so actual money is being transferred to Intel (and existing shares are being diluted as a result).
replies(1): >>loeg+G5
◧◩◪
4. loeg+G5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 22:39:42
>>Beetle+b1
That's just buying stocks (at-the-market offering).
replies(1): >>Beetle+J6
◧◩◪◨
5. Beetle+J6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 22:47:24
>>loeg+G5
Nope.

When I buy stocks at market price, the company gets none of my money.

When the company issues new stocks and sells them, the company gets the money.

replies(1): >>loeg+yb
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. loeg+yb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 23:19:12
>>Beetle+J6
I think you're maybe unfamiliar with what an ATM offering is; try googling it.
replies(1): >>Beetle+Sy
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. Beetle+Sy[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:41:06
>>loeg+yb
Fair point. The key issue in the thread, which I think we both agree on, is that yes, the government is giving money to Intel.
[go to top]