zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. kragen+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-22 20:58:13
She credits runit and daemontools as inspiration, and it looks extremely similar. I hope that at some point she writes a comparison explaining what Nitro does differently from runit and why.
replies(1): >>cbzbc+an
2. cbzbc+an[view] [source] 2025-08-22 23:22:17
>>kragen+(OP)
runit doesn't propagate SIGTERM to services it starts.
replies(2): >>kragen+6v >>atahan+dL
◧◩
3. kragen+6v[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 00:22:09
>>cbzbc+an
Hmm, is that desirable? If someone's going around sending SIGTERM to random processes they might also send SIGKILL, and there's no way Nitro can propagate SIGKILL to processes it starts.
replies(1): >>cbzbc+k91
◧◩
4. atahan+dL[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:52:56
>>cbzbc+an
It does if you use SIGHUP.
◧◩◪
5. cbzbc+k91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 07:52:36
>>kragen+6v
It does, because SIGTERM is traditionally understood as the trigger for a shutdown. Docker - for instance - will send a SIGTERM to pid 1 when a container is stopped - which goes back to a previous comment here about using a real init as pid 1 if the thing in your container forks: >>44990092
replies(1): >>kragen+sO1
◧◩◪◨
6. kragen+sO1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 15:32:19
>>cbzbc+k91
Interesting! I didn't know that—I thought that when you told sysvinit to change its runlevel you normally used some slightly richer interface than signals.
[go to top]