zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. ants_e+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-22 16:01:41
not that I recall but I may not be recalling correctly.

But certainly, anyone will bring their previous experience to the project, so there must be some Plan9 influence in there somewhere

replies(1): >>kragen+YH
2. kragen+YH[view] [source] 2025-08-22 19:39:25
>>ants_e+(OP)
They were literally using the Plan9 C compiler and linker.
replies(1): >>ants_e+C81
◧◩
3. ants_e+C81[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 22:19:33
>>kragen+YH
Yes I'm aware
replies(1): >>kragen+Zu1
◧◩◪
4. kragen+Zu1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 01:06:55
>>ants_e+C81
Literally building the project out of the Plan 9 source code is very far from "bring[ing] their previous experience to the project, (...) some Plan9 influence in there somewhere"
replies(1): >>ants_e+zB1
◧◩◪◨
5. ants_e+zB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:07:45
>>kragen+Zu1
It's a C compiler. Is your point that Go is influenced by C? ...
replies(2): >>kragen+jC1 >>tom_m+cK1
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. kragen+jC1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:14:58
>>ants_e+zB1
I think you should upgrade to a less badly quantized neural network model.
replies(1): >>ants_e+DD1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. ants_e+DD1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:25:47
>>kragen+jC1
I don't see why you've been continually replying so impolitely. I've tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I see I've just wasted my time.
replies(1): >>kragen+uF1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. kragen+uF1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:43:50
>>ants_e+DD1
Certainly isn't what it looks like to me.
replies(1): >>ants_e+pG1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
9. ants_e+pG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 02:54:04
>>kragen+uF1
okay well. good luck getting angry at people on the internet or whatever else you do
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. tom_m+cK1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 03:32:49
>>ants_e+zB1
They started there, but it now is compiled by go itself.
[go to top]