zlacker

No, I think they have a monetary incentive they have failed to disclose or a limited at best understanding of basic copyright law.

They can have a moral view that AI is "stealing" but they are claiming there is actually a legal issue at play.

>>tick_t+(OP)
Putting aside the notion that a monetary incentive is invalid for some reason, there are also plenty of open source authors who are pretty unimpressed that they only ask for attribution and even that's being laundered away via weights. If their licence isn't being respected that's certainly a legal issue.

>>thombl+nv
Pretty weird motivation for writing open source software. Just saying.