zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. geodel+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-21 20:26:07
Not Engineer + AI = Now an Engineer

Thats the reason for high valuation of AI companies.

replies(2): >>Toucan+z >>phyzom+UH
2. Toucan+z[view] [source] 2025-08-21 20:30:04
>>geodel+(OP)
Of all the things I would absolutely not trust the stock market to evaluate, "technical competence" is either near or at the top.

The people deciding how much OpenAI is worth would probably struggle to run first-time setup on an iPad.

replies(1): >>geodel+UG
◧◩
3. geodel+UG[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 01:58:06
>>Toucan+z
I agree. Seems like people took my comment above as my opinion. It was supposed to be argument of Linkedin type AI hype generators.
replies(1): >>kentm+3O
4. phyzom+UH[view] [source] 2025-08-22 02:11:39
>>geodel+(OP)
"Engineer" and "someone who can produce code" are not the same thing.
◧◩◪
5. kentm+3O[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 03:27:52
>>geodel+UG
It seemed like a normative statement, to be honest, so I misunderstood your point.
[go to top]