zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. aydyn+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-21 20:10:21
Is there a difference between "OK" and "Mediocre"?
replies(2): >>BolexN+k2 >>btucke+QG
2. BolexN+k2[view] [source] 2025-08-21 20:22:18
>>aydyn+(OP)
“Ok” I generally associate with being adequate but could obviously be better. “Mediocre” is just inadequate.
replies(2): >>Marsym+3N >>furyof+YN
3. btucke+QG[view] [source] 2025-08-22 01:16:06
>>aydyn+(OP)
I probably should have written it as “OK Engineer--“
◧◩
4. Marsym+3N[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 02:35:37
>>BolexN+k2
“Mediocre” is one of those words where common parlance doesn’t quite line up with the textbook definition. e.g. from the Oxford English Dictionary: “Of middling quality; neither bad nor good...”
◧◩
5. furyof+YN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 02:47:50
>>BolexN+k2
Some synonyms for mediocre: decent, middling, ordinary, so-so. It can mean inadequate, but it can also mean adequate.
replies(2): >>BolexN+ZB1 >>rerdav+X92
◧◩◪
6. BolexN+ZB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 12:22:39
>>furyof+YN
I’m just talking about how I view/use it.
◧◩◪
7. rerdav+X92[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 15:24:36
>>furyof+YN
Another common synonym for mediocre: has no place on a software development team. Not technically correct, admittedly, but that's how I read that word in an software engineering context. Adequate is not good enough.
[go to top]