zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. rattle+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-21 19:11:52
In my personal projects I also require all contributors to disclose rather they’ve used an editor with any autocomplete features enabled.
replies(3): >>freedo+c1 >>miloig+C6 >>monkai+7i
2. freedo+c1[view] [source] 2025-08-21 19:18:23
>>rattle+(OP)
Heh, that's a great way to make a point, but right now AI is nowhere near what a traditional editor autocomplete is. Yes you can use it that way, but it's by no means limited to that. If you think of AI as a fancy autocomplete, that's a good personal philosophy, but there are plenty of people that aren't using it that way
replies(1): >>nojs+W81
3. miloig+C6[view] [source] 2025-08-21 19:50:56
>>rattle+(OP)
Notably, tab completion is an explicltly called-out exception to this policy, as detailed in the changed docs.
4. monkai+7i[view] [source] 2025-08-21 20:53:24
>>rattle+(OP)
Autocomplete is, for the most part, a syntactic tool. AI attempts to guide the semantics of the code generated
◧◩
5. nojs+W81[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 05:15:02
>>freedo+c1
The line isn’t as clear as you might think, eg jetbrains has a mini on-device neural net powered autocomplete:

https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/full-line-code-completio...

[go to top]