zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. esskay+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-15 10:44:50
> But in the UK you can be arrested and jailed for saying something online that offends someone else.

It's hard to take this seriously, especially when if I ask for citations it'll likely be a couple of extremely obscure cases where the details are being conveniently glossed over.

replies(4): >>abtinf+h3 >>gadder+I6 >>liveon+W8 >>liveon+Pa
2. abtinf+h3[view] [source] 2025-08-15 11:19:26
>>esskay+(OP)
Wikipedia literally has an extended section on this issue. No one is going to give you citations for something trivially googlable.

> In September 2022, a British woman was arrested and charged for holding up an "abolish monarchy" sign at a proclamation ceremony for King Charles III in Edinburgh. Similar arrests throughout the country around this period over anti-monarchy republican sentiment have alarmed human rights groups.

replies(1): >>crtasm+g8
3. gadder+I6[view] [source] 2025-08-15 11:44:10
>>esskay+(OP)
You can get arrested for offending people in Whatsapp group chats: https://news.sky.com/story/grenfell-tower-model-paul-busetti...
◧◩
4. crtasm+g8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 11:54:56
>>abtinf+h3
That's bad, but it is not an example of someone going to jail.
5. liveon+W8[view] [source] 2025-08-15 11:59:37
>>esskay+(OP)
30 arrests per day and increasing

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/police-make-30-arr...

replies(1): >>esskay+Rj
6. liveon+Pa[view] [source] 2025-08-15 12:12:49
>>esskay+(OP)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/10/retired-police-o...
replies(1): >>esskay+xk
◧◩
7. esskay+Rj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 13:09:23
>>liveon+W8
Arrests != Jail. Read the original comment.
replies(2): >>lcnPyl+rp >>abtinf+KE7
◧◩
8. esskay+xk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 13:13:30
>>liveon+Pa
And theres the "obscure cases where the details are being conveniently glossed over" part. How long has he been sentence to jail for again?

I'm not defending his arrest, and quite obviously something went very wrong there, but again, we're talking about jail here. Posting an obscure cockup as if its the norm is pretty disingenuous.

replies(1): >>liveon+zC
◧◩◪
9. lcnPyl+rp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 13:41:40
>>esskay+Rj
Right, taken literally it isn't wrong. They said "can be arrested and jailed". They were arrested and they would have been jailed too if they didn't go to court and defend themselves. How does that not meet the bar of "can be arrested and jailed"?
◧◩◪
10. liveon+zC[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 14:48:59
>>esskay+xk
keep moving those goal posts to justify your denial
replies(1): >>esskay+cO
◧◩◪◨
11. esskay+cO[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-15 15:48:44
>>liveon+zC
How can there be denial for something you cant actually demonstrate is anything more than a fringe issue?
◧◩◪
12. abtinf+KE7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-18 13:05:49
>>esskay+Rj
Of course arrests = jail.

What do you think happens when you are arrested? You are taken to jail. At least for a few hours, or overnight, or even several days depending on the court schedule. And then there are the mountain of legal fees and dread of your fate hanging in the balance.

Sure, it’s not necessarily long term incarceration, but it’s enough to scare most reasonable people into submission.

[go to top]