zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jadams+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-13 18:19:54
> a few self-assessments just in case

Ah right, just a couple of forms how bad can it possi...

> Step 1: identify the 17 kinds of priority illegal content that need to be separately assessed

lol.

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-c...

replies(2): >>grepno+D3 >>mytail+a4
2. grepno+D3[view] [source] 2025-08-13 18:39:21
>>jadams+(OP)
>identify the 17 kinds of priority illegal content that need to be separately assessed

If you're a site with lots of child users, or if your site holds pornography.

replies(1): >>jadams+x4
3. mytail+a4[view] [source] 2025-08-13 18:43:06
>>jadams+(OP)
You are being facetious as "priority illegal contents" are the sort that are the ones that are obviously very unlikely to be encountered on a "normal" small community forum. So this is no more than a box-ticking exercise, really.

Regarding age verification, the OSA is explicit states that if you ban all such content in your T&Cs you do NOT need to have age verification.

replies(1): >>jadams+mf
◧◩
4. jadams+x4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 18:45:27
>>grepno+D3
No. What you have in mind is probably a Children’s Access Assessment[1], which is not what I linked.

[1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-c...

◧◩
5. jadams+mf[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 19:44:03
>>mytail+a4
> this is no more than a box-ticking exercise, really

You won't mind getting rid of it, then.

[go to top]