zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. simmer+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-13 17:44:15
Musk didnt try the hyperloop to be altruistic

He did it to kill any chance of the state improving the train/tram network so that Tesla cars would have less competition for public transport

replies(2): >>burkam+Ng >>projec+aQ2
2. burkam+Ng[view] [source] 2025-08-13 19:09:14
>>simmer+(OP)
Source: https://x.com/parismarx/status/1167410460125097990/photo/2
replies(1): >>fao_+jU
◧◩
3. fao_+jU[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 23:09:38
>>burkam+Ng
Archived here: https://archive.is/iBAJr
4. projec+aQ2[view] [source] 2025-08-14 16:26:07
>>simmer+(OP)
Yep. My city did a deal with Hyperloop to build an express airport train instead of contracting with a European or Japanese company. Hyperloop pulled out and now there is no train, what a surprise.

You might ask "why don't they just re-bid the contract?" Answer: The new 'progressive' city government is opposed to building a train for 'rich people' since there's already a non-express metro that goes through some of the most crime-ridden neighborhoods of the city. Of course no businesspeople use it and they all take Ubers (many of which are Teslas)

replies(1): >>burkam+Ap3
◧◩
5. burkam+Ap3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-14 19:30:39
>>projec+aQ2
Are you talking about Chicago? An express train sounds great, they should absolutely build one, but I think you're being a little harsh on the existing train. By America's (very low) standards it is quite convenient. It is already much faster and cheaper than driving, I have never even considered taking an Uber and I'm not sure it would be worth paying much more for an express train.
replies(1): >>projec+RG3
◧◩◪
6. projec+RG3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-14 21:02:34
>>burkam+Ap3
Correct, Chicago. The city's even already bored the station downtown as part of another project, so there's a massive underground cavern in the middle of downtown currently going unused.

The last time I took the Blue Line to the airport it was indeed fast and convenient - but dealing with luggage was kind of annoying, and there was a guy smoking weed on the train. If I were traveling for business there's no way I would use the Blue Line unless it was peak rush hour, and indeed most business travelers don't. Getting weed smoke on your work clothes is a less than ideal way to start a trip, nor is getting sweaty in your work clothes from hauling luggage around the station.

Thus the case for an express train - it would capture those price insensitive business travelers. You could charge $20 a ticket and it would still be a significant savings over Uber. Heathrow Express in London is like this and it seems to work well.

[go to top]