zlacker

> You should watch videos of YouTubers

Oh FFS.

Do you seriously consider this robust evidence?

Instead, have a look at the Crime Survey for England and Wales (HINT: This tracks peoples experience of crime and so includes unreported crime)

>>GJim+(OP)
No, that was just an example, for people not wanting to go out.

You are free to walk around these areas (just go to Knightsbridge) with an expensive watch to see if it is true or not. Get back to us safely to report.

Also... I literally just saw a cop walk past a lady overdosing as if all is fine, and did nothing to the woman who threw a bottle at the YouTuber. Who cares if it is on YouTube or not? I saw it regardless.

>>johnis+r
Is an £800 watch sufficiently expensive enough? I've been for a walk and nothing happened.

>>johnis+r
They aren't saying that crime doesn't exist, it's down compared to previously. You see how you and others can still experience crime even if it's down?

I'm guessing your solutions involve more police and anti immigration. While more social services and better prospects in life is what actually does something about the problem.

>>aemble+mg
It does not happen at all hours, or on all streets.

>>johnis+r
You’re acting like an old man who shakes fist at clouds, using their own anecdotal experiences over data in order to confirm your own pre conceived notions. Tale as old as time. What’s sad is you won’t recognise it.

>>jama21+oK4
I am 30 years old.

> using their own anecdotal experiences over data in order to confirm your own pre conceived notions

I am not doing this, at all, in fact, you are dead wrong. You think I am not aware of any of these fallacies / biases? I am self-aware enough.

Address this, tired of repeating myself: >>44905149 .

> I consumed https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-...

Official sources.

> And I consumed many people's "unsafe" experiences, similar to YOUR "safe" experiences.

I am considering both sides here.

> As I said, N = ~4 saying "it's safe" means fuck all, just like N = ~4 saying the opposite.

This should alone should strengthen the claim that I am considering both sides, and it means jack shit.

> So... you appear to be another person who invalidates and completely disregards other people's experiences (and your own Government's publishing) in favor of yours, because somehow yours is more valid. It is not.

---

Next time please do it without any personal attacks, that does not favor your case (wait, do you actually have any?) that is already standing on weak legs. If you have no case apart from personal attacks, then yeah, I am in the wrong here, with regarding to you.

If you are not interested in actually doing your research, do not even bother, I am tired of the old story that "but muh experiences matter more!!11!". They DO NOT. Your experiences are not the universal truth, and it goes both ways.