zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Oras+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-13 07:35:41
How about when it’s a local site, they don’t really care about EU traffic? It’s too much “pointless” effort to comply such as having EU servers to process user data, extra code to show the ugly cookie consent, and privacy policy and terms of service that would comply with GDPR.
replies(3): >>trinix+a1 >>mytail+z1 >>ta1243+o5
2. trinix+a1[view] [source] 2025-08-13 07:47:57
>>Oras+(OP)
Or perhaps just don't use sketchy 3rd party advertising and analytics? You can always offer companies to send you PNG's of ads and serve them to the user without any of this. You can always analyze server logs to see which pages are the most popular, without deanonymizing the users. It's how some news agencies in the EU already do.
replies(1): >>ben_w+Z6
3. mytail+z1[view] [source] 2025-08-13 07:52:06
>>Oras+(OP)
Why would you bother at all?

If you are a local site by a local company on the other side of the world you don't need to block anyone, you just ignore foreign laws.

In the case of those news sites, though I suspect that most are owned by large multinational companies whose lawyers advised that blocking EU visitors is the only 100% sure way to avoid hypothetical retaliations by EU authorities.

4. ta1243+o5[view] [source] 2025-08-13 08:34:24
>>Oras+(OP)
If it's a local site then it's not subject to the GDPR. The GDPR applies to sites aimed at europeans.

However the privacy attacking malware they embed on there to mine data from their users would apply, and that's why they block it - because America allows abuse of their citizens data, but Europe doesn't.

Of course there is no enforcement for an entity attacking European citizens in this way so they could do it anyway, but like with cookie banners the point isn't to comply with a law, the point is to get citizens to blame the law rather than the abusers.

◧◩
5. ben_w+Z6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 08:44:13
>>trinix+a1
I wish I knew what's going through the minds of the people who approve all these analytics partners. I've not been able to effectively argue even against the use of "consent or pay" in EU apps and websites, despite "the European Data Protection Board released a non-binding opinion stating that in most cases, consent-or-pay models do not constitute valid consent within the meaning of the GDPR." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_or_pay
replies(1): >>ta1243+uq
◧◩◪
6. ta1243+uq[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 11:41:30
>>ben_w+Z6
There are so many large sites which use consent-or-pay with no enforcement action taken though.
[go to top]