zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Noboru+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-11 10:17:13
The positive intentional act, I guess, is disseminating the material. Proving intent and various ancillary concepts like knowledge, etc, are the bread and butter of prosecutors, so I don't think the act would be as difficult to enforce as you suggest. Sure, there might be corner cases where you can say "oops I forgot to password protect that Dropbox link" but certainly porn websites that don't do age verification will have a hard time arguing their conduct was not intentional.
replies(1): >>Svip+Q
2. Svip+Q[view] [source] 2025-08-11 10:25:51
>>Noboru+(OP)
Which leads to my next questions: What is pornography material? Do drawings qualify? What about text? What about softcore pornography? What about a non-profit outfit? What is the amount of pornography material I need to have for it to be considered disseminating? Someone uploads a few suggestive fan art drawings to my niche bulletin board and now I am liable for a year in jail?
replies(2): >>circle+Ef >>calgoo+f23
◧◩
3. circle+Ef[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-11 12:57:51
>>Svip+Q
A judge will decide the above. That's how the law works
◧◩
4. calgoo+f23[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-12 09:52:58
>>Svip+Q
Also, what what methods of sharing? If a 16 year old shares some porn with some friends and it happens to be on a digital system somewhere, can that kids now go to jail for over a year?
[go to top]