zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. stephe+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-11 01:31:56
Yes, what is proposed is breaking the end-to-end security model, not breaking the encryption itself.

Effectively it causes the same loss of security and trust as if they broke the encryption, but it allows them the fig-leaf of pretending that you're still secure because they "haven't broken the encryption".

replies(1): >>rkomor+Lf
2. rkomor+Lf[view] [source] 2025-08-11 05:31:08
>>stephe+(OP)
I like your wording.

I wasn't expressing an opinion in that comment but I do find the whole concept terrible.

[go to top]